.svg){kind=small}
Infy AssessInvite the list, or hand out a code
One link covers a group and each student gets their own access code, so an attempt is tied to a person before it starts. An invite can be revoked, or the code closed, at any time.
For institutions
One platform for every kind of assessment.
Multiple choice, written answers, coding and interviews in one assessment. One report at the end, for the student and for you.
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- DPDP Act 2023
- GDPR
120+ institutions run on InfyLearn
Amity University
Chandigarh University
GIMS College
International School of Management Excellence
Jain University
Jaipuria Institute of Management
KIET Group of Colleges
Krea University
PSG Institute of Management
Sinhgad College of Engineering
The problem
One cohort. Three tools and a spreadsheet.
Nothing adds up until someone merges it by hand.
Today
Written examsMarked on paper
Coding practiceA second platform
InterviewsBooked one by one
ReadinessA spreadsheet
Three logins and a sheet. None of them agree on who a student is.
With Infy Assess
Data Structures, mid termB.Tech CSE · Term 4 · 412 students
Published
Written answersRubric graded
Coding4 of 4 cases
AI interviewScored
ProctoringOn
One reportLive
One assessment to set up, and it adds itself up.
Formats
Six question types in a single assessment.
Each type is its own section, with its own timer and its own marks. This is what the student sees.
Format 01Multiple choice
Students move around the paper freely and mark questions to come back to.
- Answered, skipped and marked are all separate
- Scored on submit
Format 02Written answer
A formatted editor with a word count. Marked against the rubric your faculty set.
- AI scores each criterion first
- An evaluator confirms before it saves
Format 03Coding
A real editor with the problem, examples and a language picker, inside the same assessment.
- Run on samples, then submit on the full set
- A compilation log the student can read
Format 04Video response
A spoken answer recorded in the browser, with a time limit you set per question.
- Record in the browser or upload a file
- Goes to the same evaluator
Format 05AI interview
A spoken round that runs as a section, so interview marks sit on the same record.
- Carries its own weight in the total
- Appears on the same student report
Format 06File and project
Capstone work uploaded inside the assessment and routed to a named reviewer.
- File type and size set per question
- Same rubric structure as a written answer
Marking
Your faculty set the rubric. The AI scores against it.
Faculty set the criteria and the weights. AI scores against them. An evaluator has the final say.
1
Faculty set the rubric
Criteria and weights per question. It will not save until the weights total a hundred.
2
AI scores each criterion
With the reasoning shown, measured against the rubric rather than an impression.
3
An evaluator confirms
They edit the score and the feedback, then save. Nothing reaches the student before that.
Integrity
You set the rules. The platform keeps the proof.
Who can open it is your choice, what gets watched is your choice, and every flag keeps the moment behind it.
Choose what gets watched
Seven checks, each one a switch, with presets for a practice attempt or a whole group. A check left off is never recorded at all, so it cannot appear on a report or lower a score.
See every flag, with its evidence
An integrity score built only from the checks you turned on, then every flag with the frame and the timestamp behind it. Your staff decide the outcome, never the platform.
AI proctoring flags it as it happens
Warn on screen, end the attempt after a set number of tab switches, or do neither. The limit is a number you set, and zero means strict. Each warning names what was detected and says the moment was recorded.
Reporting
One record, read at whatever level you need.
Question, student, batch, and the coding track across the term. The same record answers all four, so a review does not start with three exports and a merge.
Every question, with
the ideal answer
What the student wrote sits beside what the answer should have been, so feedback needs no translation. The same file goes to the student and to faculty.
The page a student
actually gets
Score, section by section with the weight each carried, how they compare with the class, and the proctoring record. One downloadable page covering every format.
Movement, rather
than a snapshot
Batch average against the target and against last year's cohort, month by month, so you can tell whether the training is working while the year is still running.
Coding readiness,
topic by topic
For the coding track: who is prepared, who is not, and who has not attempted the topic yet. Filter by batch, section or topic and every figure re-answers at that level.
- Exportable in full, never truncated
- Students who need support roll into a list
Every view comes out of the same record, with nothing rekeyed.
See a sample report
Between exams
Readiness is built between the exams.
Students practise on their own time. You see who is keeping at it, months before a company arrives.
Coding Practice
A problem library the student works through on their own time, filtered by topic, difficulty and whether they have solved it yet. The same editor the graded coding section uses.
- Problems tagged by topic, difficulty and company
- An unfinished attempt resumes where it stopped
Coding Report
What the practice adds up to, per student. Active days and streaks, accuracy split by difficulty, and a topic proficiency radar against the batch average.
- Accuracy by difficulty, not just a solved count
- Topic wise breakdown with a skills status per topic
The suite
It works on its own. It works better alongside the rest.
Infy Assess is complete on its own. Run the other InfyLearn products too, and they share one student record.
Infy LMS
Terms, credits and specialisations come from one place, so an assessment knows which programme it belongs to.
Explore Infy LMS
Infy Interview
Practice interview results sit against the same student record as the assessment results.
Explore Infy Interview.svg)
Infy Resume
Assessment history carries into a verified profile a student can show a recruiter.
Explore Infy Resume
Infy Recruit
Placement drives read readiness from the same record, from job posting through to offer.
Explore Infy Recruit
And it fits the systems you already run
See how it connects
Infy Assess connects to your LMS or ERP over an API, so results land where your team already looks rather than behind one more separate login.
Questions
Asked in almost every evaluation.
Can this catch a student using AI or a second device?
Partly. Lockdown mode blocks the tools on the exam machine, object detection flags a phone or a book in frame, and one device per session prevents a parallel login. No proctoring tool can see into another room, which is why the AI evaluator also reads the answer itself. Every flag keeps the frame and timestamp behind it, and your staff decide the outcome.
Does the AI decide marks?
No. Your faculty set the rubric and the weights. AI scores each criterion and shows its reasoning. An evaluator edits the score and the feedback and saves it. Nothing reaches the student before that.
Do students know they are being monitored?
Yes, and whether they are monitored at all is your setting. When proctoring is on, a notice beforehand lists what is watched, an indicator stays on screen, and a privacy notice is linked from both.
Can students take an assessment on a phone?
Yes. Every format adapts to a small screen with the navigator, timer and review states intact, and an attempt resumes where the student left off. Lockdown mode is the exception and is desktop only.
Will it handle our cohort size?
Yes. Thousands of attempts can run at the same time, across multiple campuses. Question banks and rubrics are set per programme.
Does it integrate with our LMS or ERP?
Yes, through APIs. Roster sync, scheduling, exporting results and record management, so results land where your team already looks.
What training and support do we get?
Live onboarding, a platform walkthrough, help setting up your first assessments, user manuals, and a named success manager afterwards.
See it on your own assessment
See what this looks like for your cohort.
Send us one assessment. We set it up as it would actually run, so you see your own paper, not a demo.
- Fifteen minutes, on a paper you already run
- Six question types in one paper, scored end to end